“It’s not that deep”
is an extremely common
phrase uttered by people of most demographics, old people, young
people, all genders, sexualities and more. But the one consistency
with this phrase, no matter who it’s uttered by,
is
if someone is
speaking about an activity they enjoy, if someone is discussing a
real issue affecting people, no matter the topic, if someone is
passionate about something and they hear the phrase “it’s not
that deep,” it is either one of the most disappointing things you
can hear or the most infuriating thing you can hear. I choose the
second option, myself.
But
why? Why do I let this obvious “rage-bait” get me so riled up?
Why do people feel sad when they’re told this? Because it is one of
the most invalidating things you could say to someone being
passionate about a topic. Not just because it’s rude, but because
it’s a full dismissal of someone and their ideas, which they
clearly identify with on a personal level. But it’s not only a
dismissal of passion but of information.
When
someone discusses a real issue plaguing a community or a problematic
behavior pattern that could evolve into something worse (i.e. a
pipeline of some sort) and someone says “it’s not that deep” or
“you’re reading into it too much,” this plays into a belief
system labeled “anti-intellectualism.” This mindset is the base
idea of dismissing any form of higher thought with an intent to just
be content with what’s told to them; “Ignorance is bliss” taken
literally.
The
idea of intentionally ignoring or blocking out information that
generally makes you unhappy is downright, (excuse my informality) one
of the dumbest, intentionally ignorant and moronic things I’ve ever
heard about or experienced.
The
entire joke of “that friend who’s too woke” being a relatable
sentiment is a telltale sign that anti-intellectualism is becoming
more and more common with the social media age as people try to enjoy
themselves without confronting the real issue with the things they
find comforting; convenience over ethics.
Temu,
Amazon, and Shein are mostly used as prime examples of unethical but
convinent methods of shopping, Streaming has been shown to barely pay
artists as fairly as they should be and certain jokes have limits to
how they’re said, what they really mean and their origins. There
are alternatives, you don’t have to choose any these
options. But people have been so conditioned to not care about these
things that they don’t view any of these examples as real issues.
That
general apathy towards the general ethics of things is one of the
biggest things holding communities back. Black people giving “n-word
passes,” younger generations stealing and using slang formed from
marginalized communities and convenient shopping methods are all
things that are all too common nowadays but if you bring up any of
the obvious flaws with these things, people dismiss it. They ignore
your criticisms. They want to enjoy things regardless of their flaws.
Convenience
over ethics.